What’s better than being outside on a beautiful day? Turns out the answer may be… nothing.
This short article provides some insight into why Spring is a uniquely beneficial time of the year for us to spend time outdoors and the positive impact that being in the fresh air and sun has on our productivity and mood. If you need any motivation to get a 30 minute break from the screen on a workday print this out and have it ready to tape to your screen as a ‘Be Back Soon’ message!
First off, let me be upfront on the fact that I think there are plenty of useless studies published and that the most interesting part of some of them is that they managed to get funding in the first place. As parodied in the Onion: “New Study shows 85% of Americans do not know all of the dance moves to the National Anthem”.
I’m not here to write about a study stating the obvious: people enjoy spring weather. Anyone who has stepped outside on a beautiful Spring day, especially here in the Lehigh Valley, knows how wonderful a time of year this is. According to science, I would like to shed some light on researched and documented proof as to why this particular season we are just entering into is proven to be one of the best times of the year to be outside.
For a bit of background, the University of Michigan conducted a study later published in Psychological Today. Part of the U of M thought process in initially coming up with the study’s concept and parameters tied into Season Affective Disorder, commonly (and fittingly) referred to as SAD. It’s well accepted that colder temperatures contributed to the symptoms of those afflicted by SAD. It was also believed that there was not an opposite correlation with simply being in warmer weather. Between the opposing ends of cold and warm days and the mental effect on us, there was a lot of unknown territory to be explored, and the University of Michigan signed on for the fact-finding mission.
This study’s objective was to determine how being outdoors impacted three specific areas: mood, memory, and flexible thinking. This study involved 600 volunteers from around the US and was conducted in three separate phases, which factored in various weather conditions, including temperatures and barometric pressures. Throughout the study, the participants were asked a series of test questions such as remembering number sequences and reviewing fictionalized performance reviews of co-workers. These experiments were conducted so that the subjects were tested in various scenarios that involved indoors vs. outdoors in a range of conditions.
The study’s final result has plenty of graphical data and arrow diagrams, but for the sake of keeping this on point, I’